Rhode Island Bill Would Criminalize Offensive Speech

Rhode Island AG Peter Kilmartin

Rhode Island AG Peter Kilmartin

It may feel more like the USSR than Rhode Island if state Senate bill S2630 passes. The proposed legislation, promoted by Attorney General Peter Kilmartin, would criminalize folks who say the wrong things on social media, such as what happens when one trolls another.

Specific points of the bill include:

Posting message through electronic medium.
(a) A person shall not post a message to any other person, through the use of any medium of communication, including the Internet or a computer, computer program, computer system, or computer network, or other electronic medium of communication, without the intended recipient’s consent, if all of the following apply:
(1) The person knows or has reason to know that posting the message could cause two (2) or more separate non continuous acts of unconsented contact with the recipient;
(2) Posting the message is intended to cause conduct that would make the intended recipient feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested;
(3) Conduct arising from posting the message would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress and to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested; and
(4) Conduct arising from posting the message causes the intended recipient to suffer emotional distress and to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.
(b) Every person convicted of an offense under this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for the first offense and shall be subject to imprisonment not exceeding one year, a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both, and an order of restitution as provided herein.
In fact, you don’t even have to be in the state to be charged with this.
(e) A person may be prosecuted in this state for violating or attempting to violate this section only if one of the following applies:
(1) The person posts the message while in this state;
(2) Conduct arising from posting the message occurs in this state;
(3) The intended recipient is present in this state at the time the offense or any element of the offense occurs; or
(4) The person posting the message knows that the intended recipient resides in this state.
Unlike current state “cyber-stalking” laws, which require police to prove a pattern of harassing behavior, someone could be prosecuted under the new Kilmartin bill for a single post if at least two others pile on with “separate non-continuous acts of unconsented contact” with the victim. The original post would have to be made with the intent to cause emotional distress and be expected to cause distress in a “reasonable person.”
The bill, sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Frank Lombardi, D-Cranston, and in the House by Rep. Kathleen Fogarty, D-South Kingstown, was modeled after legislation in Michigan, according to Kilmartin spokeswoman Amy Kempe.
So watch what you say online, they’re watching you.


      • Armed Vet says

        And the same people that view porno, act in it, swim in it.. you see, it’s OK when they do something perverse while at the same time it’s NOT OK for others to do what is a God given right – free speech. And for you lefty morons I am not implying that threats are free speech. The reason we have a brain is to differentiate between the two.

      • GussieJCasey says

        “my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.”….

        two days ago new Mc.Laren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Here!oi1124➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsFirst/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:::::!oi1124….

  1. 1984U says

    This guy’s bill offends me deeply. How is this law going to address that? Can I report him for submitting this Bill? How is this going to be enforced? How do we report members of the government that offend us? Who decides if the government is offending the governed? This very bill can cause the governed “emotional distress and to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed.”

      • Rooby Doo says

        And hey, witness, I’m retired now, but was a high school principal for 20+ years, and we don’t have kids read it anymore. Or Clavell’s “Children’s Story”, or “Lord of the Flies”, or any other piece of thought provoking literature. But the year after I retired, my successor created a “safe space” in the office adjacent to the counselor. Unbelieveable, huh?

        • witnesstothecarnage says

          Yes. I believe Lord Of The Flies should be required reading, as well as 1984, and Animal Farm. And, just to make them ache… Toffler’s Future Shock (I had to, why shouldn’t they??). 🙂

          I’m done blaming the indoctrinators… I want to see the parents, of these now and forever loads on society, take some responsibility for creating these selfish little beasts.

          I feel safe in assuming you did your job, and thank you for trying to create thinkers, not thoughts.

          • Rooby Doo says

            Well, thanks for the nice words in your third paragraph. I tried. And as to your second paragraph…. Amen, brother.

  2. FlamingLimousineLiberal says

    I’m offended, feel terrorized, frightened, molested, and abused by the sheer idiocy of government.

    Where do I file my lawsuit?

  3. Tatiana Covington says

    Well, if you don’t like the fucking thing, then don’t fucking read it, you dumbass cocksuckers. How’s that for offensive? Stupid jerkoffs. Assholes!

Leave a Reply